91原创aily
Logo Image
A new research study led by 91原创鈥檚 Michael Crossley titled 鈥淥pposing global change drivers counterbalance trends in breeding North American monarch butterflies鈥 published in Global Change Biology on June 10.
A new research study led by 91原创鈥檚 Michael Crossley titled 鈥淥pposing global change drivers counterbalance trends in breeding North American monarch butterflies鈥 published in Global Change Biology on June 10.

Hailing monarchs

Photos by Michele Walfred and Pat Davis

91原创鈥檚 Michael Crossley investigates impact of herbicides and warming temperatures on breeding trends in monarch butterflies

Largely because of well-publicized, diminishing winter colonies in Mexico and California, monarch butterflies across North America have been long thought to be declining as a result of diminishing summer habitat. Previous butterfly research shows that the size of overwintering monarch colonies has fallen across several decades. But what is happening when monarchs breed in the summer was less clear.

In a published in Global Change Biology, lead author Michael Crossley, assistant professor and agricultural entomologist at the 91原创, and his collaborators examined trends in breeding monarchs across their entire range, and found there are local regions of decline, but also regions of increase. When considering the entire species range, there was no overall decline, and in fact, even a slight increase in abundance.

鈥淭he whole reason that we did this research is because monarch colonies have been declining,鈥 said Crossley. 鈥淯p until now, there were real fears that the monarch is in trouble.鈥

The study鈥檚 results suggest that population growth in summer is compensating for losses during the winter. Additionally, findings indicate that changing environmental variables have offsetting effects on deaths and reproduction.

North America鈥檚 three largest countries have more in common than playing the 2026 hosts of soccer鈥檚 biggest spectacle 鈥 the FIFA World Cup. The perception of the monarchs鈥 decline had prompted the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if the species warrants a higher level of protection. Canada鈥檚 equivalent agency is strongly considering listing monarchs as an endangered species because of the declines in Mexico.

As the researchers analyzed the data, patterns emerged and were location specific. Portions of the U.S. Northeast and parts of the Midwest revealed population declines. The U.S. Southeast and Northwest were unchanged or increasing, yielding a slightly positive overall trend across the species range. Monarchs in Florida appear to be doing exceptionally well.

鈥淥ur question was, 鈥楢re monarchs declining across their breeding range?鈥 The key take home message was yes, monarchs are declining in some places, but increasing in other locations,鈥 said Crossley, who conducts research and teaches in the 91原创 Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology. 鈥淭here is no consistent, long-term trend.鈥

So how is that possible? Near agricultural fields that use glyphosate, which is used in products such as Roundup, sites typically had fewer monarchs. This occurrence was especially evident in the upper Midwest 鈥 the corn and soy belt. The researchers also found positive effects of temperature, which is generally increasing faster in northern latitudes, which seems to be counterbalancing glyphosate effects.

鈥淭hese two effects seem to cancel each other out, especially in the upper Midwest,鈥 said Crossley. 

Crossley contends that the different trends in these locations are related to the environment.

鈥淔or example, there are populations now that will overwinter in California, Florida or even southern Georgia because it鈥檚 become more feasible with increasing winter temperatures,鈥 Crossley said. 鈥淲e may see fewer migrants because monarchs are doing well, staying in Florida and not joining the migration.鈥 

Since accelerating climate change may bring growing threats, Crossley cautioned against complacency.

The dataset that the researchers used was made possible by the North American Butterfly Association and thousands of citizen scientists 鈥 volunteers and butterfly enthusiasts 鈥 who collected butterfly counts for the past 25 years at more than 400 sites around the continent.

Another conclusion of the study is that other butterfly species are facing greater peril than monarchs. The authors argue that some of these butterflies 鈥 like Poweshiek skipperling (in the upper Midwest), Florida leafwing (in extreme southern Florida) and Hermes copper (in extreme southern California) 鈥 deserve more attention. Though monarchs are the most popular among the general public, they are far from the only type of butterfly. The North American Butterfly Association observes more than 450 species. Though it鈥檚 facing overall population declines, the monarch is doing comparatively well; 320 species face steeper population losses.

鈥淚t seems like breeding monarchs in North America are not in trouble despite winter colony declines,鈥 said Crossley. 鈥淭his could lead to several explanations about why a disconnect exists between numbers in the breeding range and numbers in overwintering sites.鈥

The grueling journey

The findings show that monarchs are breeding in strong numbers. Then the insects trek to places like Mexico to overwinter, but these colonies are generally shrinking in size. So, what is hindering the journey southward to the winter colonies? Study co-author Andy Davis of the University of Georgia has investigated parasites of monarchs and found that a protozoan parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE), is on the rise, and could affect the success of the fall migration. As Davis described, making that journey with parasites in tow is equivalent to running a marathon with the flu. And monarchs鈥 total mileage, which falls between 1,200 and 2,800 miles, far eclipses human鈥檚 26.2-mile mark for a marathon. 

鈥淎 lot of monarchs are not going to make that southward journey if they are infected,鈥 said Crossley. 鈥淥ne way to reconcile the disconnect [between breeding numbers and overwinter numbers] is to say, well, maybe monarchs have an incredible ability to rebound every spring and summer from relatively small overwintering sizes. And the decline is occurring during this southward migration.鈥

Besides parasites, other factors are affecting monarchs鈥 migration. Climate change is making the journey south hotter and drier, making the extended trip more arduous for these small creatures. Additionally, many butterflies use certain valleys as their flyways, which are unfortunately along highways. Cars and trucks are simply running into the iconic insects, something Crossley points out could potentially be amended.

鈥淔or other types of species, officials reduce speed limits or reroute traffic during certain times of year, so these animals can cross the road,鈥 said Crossley. 

Finally, when you鈥檙e on a long trip, you always stop and grab a bite to eat, right? Monarchs feed on nectar. Loss of habitat and nectar resources mean more butterflies lack the energy to fly south. The average person can take action on their own and plant native, fall-blooming goldenrods, asters and perennial sunflowers to fuel the monarchs. 

鈥淲e certainly can鈥檛 go wrong by making more insect habitats. Whether humans or animals, we could all use more,鈥  Crossley said. 鈥淲e can do that with native plants right in our own backyards.鈥

The researchers found positive effects of temperature, which is generally increasing faster in northern latitudes, seems to be counterbalancing the fewer number of monarchs near agricultural sites that use glyphosate, which is used in products such as Roundup.
The researchers found positive effects of temperature, which is generally increasing faster in northern latitudes, seems to be counterbalancing the fewer number of monarchs near agricultural sites that use glyphosate, which is used in products such as Roundup.

More Research Stories

See More Stories

Contact Us

Have a 91原创aily story idea?

Contact us at ocm@udel.edu

Members of the press

Contact us at mediarelations@udel.edu or visit the Media Relations website

ADVERTISEMENT